An open chat with Elm part deux..

"elmysterio said... PC post it all I really don't give a fuck. You seem to think that you can hurt me with your threats but the fact is you can't. I have all of the same posts and emails that you have. Go for it."

Okay Elm... while I have no interest in hurting you... I will post more... and to think the last one was crazy... there's still more:

Chat on 07/25/07:

me: Elm, we're getting ready to break the 'blessed' news... I'll explain more after the post.
9:12 PM eloise: whaT BLESSED NEWS?
me: as Reene calls it.
eloise: CALLS IT WHAT
9:13 PM me: You'll see... give me a bit... was just giving you a head's up as a friend.
eloise: OK9:17 PM me: I'll let you know when it's posted.
9:18 PM BTW... if there's anything I can help with in regards to the ** stuff... let me know.
9:19 PM eloise: pc you better watch what you post because you will be sued
me: I don't think so.
eloise: so you need to tell me what it is
me: You'll see.
9:21 PM eloise: PC I am serious about this you better watch what you post because attorneys are being called right now
me: That's okay... an attorney told me this.
9:22 PM eloise: then the attorney could be disbarred and you will be servewdf by 5PM tommorow
me: Elm, there's no reason to be like that... you don't even know what I'm going to post.
9:23 PM eloise: pc I am serious Iam not saying this the party involved is me: Well we'll go from there...
9:24 PM eloise: so you will be sued because privledged information can get you slapped with crimnal charges tommorow
9:25 PM me: Again... you don't even know what I'm going to say... no reason to assume.
9:26 PM eloise: PC you need to tell me and I will not post it but I am trying to save your ass
9:27 PM me: hold on...
9:30 PM eloise: pc you will be arreseted and and the attorney who told you will be disbarred
eloise: I'm on the pjhone with renee
me: With all due respect, I can't be arrested, trust me.
9:31 PM eloise: pc she is on the phne with an attorney as we speak
9:32 PM she is not playing and she will have you arrested
me: Elm, she can't... there's no reason to even make that statement.
eloise: you will be arrested I am trying to protect you
9:33 PM then you better post it before the cops get there she is already pissed at you so wy push it
9:34 PM me: Elm, I'm sorry I brought up the conversation.
eloise: don't be sorry just be smart
9:35 PM if you got any information from ***** he will get arrested to
me: I think you know better than that.
9:38 PM eloise: pc they know who you are
9:39 PM me: I don't care... I know who 'they' are too.
9:41 PM eloise: PC you really don't understand this this is big and you be busted
]9:42 PM they are coming to get you and I am not lying
me: Elm, we've chatted a lot, and I've always considered you as a friend. These threats of being 'busted' are unfounded... I've already spoken with an attorney, and I'm not breaking the law in the least. Again... you don't even know what's going to be said... why the attitude?
9:43 PM eloise: if you got proivledge infrmation form an attorney that attorney will be disbarred. me: Let's go ahead and just end this conversation.
9:44 PM eloise: pc just tell me and we can end all of this
9:45 PM PC I realy don't give a rats ass what it is and i will not try nd scoop you9:46 PM there are allot of people who are really pissed right now and you will be loocked up
9:47 PM are you there
9:51 PM pc are you there
9:55 PM pc are you there
9:56 PM me: Yes Elm, I'm still here... please don't threaten me with legal recourse, because there isn't any... have Ree's attorney's state what law I've broken.
9:57 PM eloise: renee's attorney will be on the phone in a minute
9:58 PM this can not be released until a judge signs of on the deal
9:59 PM this is serious did you talk t one of oe and harlows attorney
me: Again Elm, you seem to assume what I know... even though I never told you.
10:00 PM eloise: then tell me and we can put an end to this
me: It's posted.
eloise: I promise I wont pst it you can if it is not what I think it is
10:01 PM you fucked up big time
10:02 PM someone is gooing to get disbarred and you will be an accesory to the fact10:04 PM that was client attorney client privledged information and you will be served by 5PM.
10:05 PM me: Apparently someone told the press... that's how we got it.
10:06 PM eloise: PC its to late for that you told me you got it from an attorney and they will be disbarred
me: Whatever Elm... have a good evening, and hope to chat with you when you're in a better mood.
10:07 PM eloise: I'm in a fine mood I was just trying to protect you but you went and blw it.
10:08 PM me: Elm, as much as you might be upset... I haven't broken any law. I'm simply reporting what was given to me by sources in PA and VA.
10:10 PM eloise: you really should not have done this
10:11 PM me: I apologize if you're upset... but I'm only simply reporting what's being done.
10:12 PM eloise: I know that but you can't do this because it is news you have to wait until it was finallized why would you attempt to damage Joe an Harlow chanct to get ther attorney's paid
10:13 PM It reqal;l makes nop sense to me that you would do this well that little port probably juswt undid it
10:14 PM well that little report just most likely undid it
10:15 PM you don't seem to understand what you have done now the state of virginia will just take the house back
10:16 PM you are really not looking at the big picture here
10:17 PM this was not to be mentioned until a judge signed the order and now that most like;ly won't happen
10:19 PM I guess you just basically signed their death warrant
10:20 PM me: No I didn't... I'm just telling the truth.
eloise: that was to pay the down paynment for there attorney
10:21 PM now they will have to have a public defender so I guess you did me:
Elm... they're home had no value... especially with the second mortgage.
10:22 PM eloise: you don't know that, you have no clue what the value of the house was
10:23 PM you are basing your value on the accesed value not the market value
10:24 PM me: Elm... I live here.
eloise: do you own a home?
me: Yep... bought it 3 years ago.
10:25 PM eloise: I deal with homes eveyday and they are always worth more than the acessed value is it a house or a condo
10:27 PM homes have a different value whewn accessed tha a condo would me: It's a 3700 sq ft house sitting on just shy of an acre.
10:28 PM eloise: and is it in the city proper? or in a outlying area
me: It resides in the City of Norfolk.
10:29 PM I'm in E. Ocean View... just a walk across the street from VB.
10:30 PM eloise: virginia beach has a higher value norfolk would and halows house was in an exclusive neighborhood close to a counrty club
10:31 PM did you buy it from judy boone?
me: Harlow's neighbor's house just sold for 379k... trust me... I keep up with real estate prices too :)
10:33 PM eloise: there have been no sales in birdneck woods in the last 7 months and harlow's mom is in real estate and she keeps track of that area
10:34 PM me: Elm, I'm not going to get in an arguement with you... but the seller has 2 lots left ( out of the 17 ) and is currently listing a house now for $425k... and it hasn't even been built yet.
10:37 PM eloise: those lotas are oddly shape and the houses have to be smaller to fit on the lots. harlow's house was 4572 sqft custom built home
10:38 PM me: Elm, with all due respect... I hope Harlow's mom, as a real estate agent can sell it for as much as she can.
10:40 PM eloise: that is fine and good but you really did jepordize their defense and you could have possibly set the case for several months
me: That
10:41 PM 's certainly not my intention.
eloise: any way does it make you feel good that you could have possibly ruined thre chances to a fair trial.
me: My intention since the begining... ( what May/June? ) is to tell the truth... I think I've done a pretty good job of that.
10:43 PM eloise: yeah you had so far but this was pushing the limits
10:44 PM me: I'm only publishing the information given to me.., I certainly don't make this stuff up like **, and others.
10:47 PM eloise: you do realize that Harlow's blog is written by his girl friend. And she supports Harlow 100% and is helping him raise money for his legal fee's
me: His girl friend?
eloise: yup10:48 PM the real deal
10:49 PM me: Where's the police Elm? I don't hear anyone knocking on my door?
eloise: and she misses his hard loveboneand you ight have ruineder chaces to ride the stiff oneagain
10:50 PM sitr tight she is truly pissed
10:51 PM me: How long has he had this 'girl' friend?
eloise: quite a while from what I undersnd me: Well tell her it's nothing personal... just a media thing.
10:52 PM eloise: do you work for the media?
10:54 PM me: I'm out.

Is There Room at the Inn?

With the upcoming trial(s) of Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes bound to happen sometime this winter ( Jury selection begins 01/05/09), I figured it's never too early to begin planning on where to stay during the event... assuming you're coming to witness the trial in person.

It's a pretty certain bet that the trial will last for more than a day, so unless you're planning to sleep in your car, or on a local park bench, you're going to need a place to stay. Here's a listing of all the hotels/motels/inns within the Wilkes-Barre area, ordered by distance to/from the courthouse (distances are approximate, because none of these mapping programs are ever 100% correct):

Ramada Inn - 0.6 miles
Best Western Genetti Hotel - 0.8 miles
Wilkes-Barre Inn - 1.5 miles
Host Inn All Suites Hotel - 2.1 miles
Holiday Inn - 2.1 miles
Hilton Garden Inn - 2.4 miles
Econo Lodge Wilkes-Barre - 2.9 miles
Comfort Inn & Suites - 2.9 miles
Days Inn Wilkes-Barre - 3.4 miles
Red Roof Inn Wilkes-Barre - 3.6 miles
Hampton Inn - 3.6 miles
Woodlands Inn Resort - 3.8 miles
Fox Ridge Inn (if you're feeling really nostalgic) - 4.2 miles
Best Western East Mountain Inn & Suites - 4.3 miles

I'm currently planning on staying at the Hilton Garden Inn. If it was good enough for Sean and Grant... then it's good enough for me... just kidding... I'm a Hilton Honors member and will just use some points for a free stay... plus it's only about 3-4 minutes away drive-time.

Once the actual trial date for Harlow and Joe is released, I'll provide additional information... such as capacity limits in the courtroom, etc...

Update: Both the Ramada and Best Western Genetti are within easy walking distance. It took me less than 10 minutes.

Update 2: PC will likely be staying at the Best Western Genetti.

Let the Meter Start Ticking

Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes's dockets are now beginning to show "Case Financial Information". While the dollar amounts are fairly miniscule at the moment, I would certainly expect these numbers to continue to climb as time goes along.

Costs/Fees for Joe and Harlow are Witness Fees thus far:

Kerekes' Attorneys want Prosecutors Sanctioned

The Times Leader is reporting that attorneys for homicide suspect Joseph Kerekes again want prosecutors to be forbidden from rebutting Kerekes’ alibi defense.

Kerekes’ attorneys, John Pike, Shelley Centini, and Mark Bufalino, had filed notice they might present testimony at trial to show Kerekes was at a Plains Township hotel when Bryan Kocis was being killed at his Dallas Township home.

Prosecutors responded to that by indicating they had 385 possible witnesses to rebut the alibi claim.

But Kerekes’ attorneys later asked for prosecutors to be sanctioned because the list was incomplete and contained witnesses who had not been contacted by prosecutors. They wanted a judge to forbid prosecutors from rebutting the alibi at trial.

Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas Judge Peter Paul Olszewski Jr. later ordered the prosecutors to revamp the list.

They did, but in court papers filed Thursday, Kerekes’ attorneys again asked for the sanctions because the list is incomplete, contains witnesses who have not been contacted, and is not in conformity with the law, they said.

Olszewski will rule after an April 15 hearing.

An Open Chat With Elm on 7/27/07...

While some of this may be hard to follow... I've tried to differentiate who Elm is versus Me in regards to the Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes conversation... if you still have any question... please feel free to ask... trust me... there's some interesting stuff in this.

11:24 PM me: Well the police never showed up... guess they were to busy dealing with actual crimes :)
eloise: im glad
11:25 PM me: Elm, between you and I...
eloise: yeah
11:26 PM me: Please don't threaten me with things that we both know won't happen... as the police being at my door by 5pm today.
11:27 PM eloise: I thought they were because they were on the phone when you were instant messaged me.
11:28 PM me: ... okay... :)
11:29 PM Elm, I've already spoken with my attorney, and did so before that infamous post.
What are the police going to arrest me for... telling the truth?
11:30 PM eloise: thats fine, but they could have lost the house
me: You folks don't even know where I live.
eloise: yeah they do,
11:31 PM me: Okay... just like Harlow and Joe's house is worth $750k... Elm, it's been a pleasure knowing you, but I think you've become too BB.
11:32 PM eloise: no need to argue this point, its done just move on I have
11:33 PM don'ty be made at me I was just trying to stop something bad from possibly happening
11:35 PM me: I'm not mad at you Elm... I just can't understand why you would threaten me with police coming to my door when you know in reality that's not going to happen.
eloise: PC I am on the side of the truth. I was trying to stop you from getting in trouble because there were threats being made on the phone.
11:36 PM me: Perhaps we should ask Renee Vincent?
eloise: pc I was told that the police were going to come to you door.
11:38 PM PC she is just tring to help Joe and Harlow get there attorneys straightend out. that is all and the fact that she thought that you would jepordize that caused her to be scared.
11:39 PM PC I was on the phone when you instat maged me with renee
11:41 PM when I saw that I knew what you were goingto post beccause we were talking about the possibility of getting the house back.
me: So why would I be called a liar when you know I was telling the truth?
11:42 PM eloise: you don't understad what is going on behind the scenes ad it really is nt my place to tell you but you could have cause allot of people alot of problems just like ***** is right know.
whern did I call you a liar
11:43 PM me: I'm not ******, and I think you know that... nor do I follow his tactics.
eloise: if you are alking about the post she did on harlows blog thatwas a failed attempt at damage control
11:44 PM me: I was referencing to the nice long post Renee or whom ever did on Harlow's blog about me. I got a big laugh about being accused of being strait and seen with a blonde woman.
11:45 PM eloise: the major prolem with this wholecase is that here ae to many people telling to many storiesand not everyon has al the facts, myself included. if you have noticed I have been staing away form posting information about the proceedings because thay chang everyday
11:46 PM me: ... and as you've seen... I don't post anything that's not true.
11:47 PM The 'evidence' in regards to Renee wanting will be posted shortly... along with the screen captures of her rantings that are now deleted.
11:48 PM This wouldn't be:
RENEE VINCENT
2435 LAURENS RD
GREENVILLE, SC 29607
eloise: there are peoples lives at stake here and I do notwant be responsible o ruining there chance at a fair trial or jeoperdizing there chance of getting good lawyers by something that I post on my blog. I have known about the huse deal fore over a week but I did not post it because I did not to take the chance and ruin it for them
11:50 PM me: Elm, as I've told you before... I'm here to print the truth... that's it.
eloise: go ahead and do it if it will make you happy but I would not do it .
fine print the truth but you don't have to hurt pople to do that.
11:51 PM me: I have no intention or reason to disclose who Renee is... that really doesn't have anything to do with the case.
11:52 PM I just wanted to let you know... I know as well.
eloise: I try not to hurt people who are tying to help just the one who are rying to cause problems for others. why are you telling me this any way you are going to do what you want to do anyway
11:53 PM me: I gave you my promise... I haven't lied to you yet have I?
11:54 PM eloise: I would rather not know about it. I think she is a nice woman who has taken an interest in someo who she could have easily judst have let sit in jail with no hope in the world.
11:55 PM ok heres the deal i you repeat this it is over. She took out a second on her home to retain the layer for harlow. the sale of the house is to pay that second off. that is why she was so pissed. get it
11:56 PM me: I get it... but I don't really see what she would have gotten...
eloise: now do you understand? this is noeven her child but she did this for him
11:57 PM me: The house, including the 2nd mortgage didn't offer much equity.
11:58 PM If you read my latest post... you'll also see that 750 is pie in the sky.
eloise: you are basing the vsalue on the assessed value for the taxes not the appraised value for resale I explained t on you blog
me: I'm basing it on homes that are for sale, or have sold in the 16 home neighborhood.
12:00 AM eloise: PC the house is over 4300 sqft and it is all custom through ot and it is in an exclusive neighbothood and it isright next to a golf course and a country club renee lives dwn the srtreet and she is amortgage broker I tink she would know the value
12:01 AM me: What ever elm.
eloise: you can not base the vale of one house against the nex unless the are idintical and these are all custom homes so they are all different
me: I think I posted some stuff Renee wasn't expecting.
12:02 AM So one house out of 16 is worth 250-300k more than the rest?
eloise: why are we even talking about this any more it is done
12:03 AM that is possible
12:04 AM as far as I"m concerned it's a done deal. its been posted and we wil see if the judge signs off on it. if he does then great if he does not then to bad. at least they had some hope.
12:07 AM me: I'm pretty sure he will... what I don't like is being called a liar. Renee knew what I said was the truth... yet she decided to spin it in a way to make it appear as if I wasn't telling the truth... no big deal... as soon as the deed is changed (from the State) it will be posted.
12:09 AM I have nothing against the Harlow camp... other than it's not smart to make statements that aren't true... like the police being at my door by 5 today.
eloise: i can justhope that it is signed off and all is well
12:10 AM renee thinksof harlow as her child and se will do anything to protect him
12:11 AM that is a typical mothers responce
me: Elm, just to let you know... the sale of the house information wasn't given to me by an attorney. Perhaps Renee should start questioning Kerekes.
12:12 AM eloise: why would he do that?
me: Kerkes spans more than one person.
12:13 AM Why would Joe give some idiot response to the press? There's lot's of questions.
eloise: that isfine thewn you shouldnot feel like it is a problem
12:14 AM me: I never did.
eloise: then lets just consider the matter closed and move on
12:15 AM it is yesterdays new anyway
me: That's what I asked for yesterday ;)
12:16 AM I'm not here to get in a fight, claim news that isn't true, etc...
12:17 AM eloise: I am just getting so tired of all of the name calling and backstabbing that is involved in this case. it is just truly sickening.
12:18 AM me: I don't disagree... and if you haven't noticed... that's not happening on my blog.
12:19 AM eloise: you just do what you have to do and I will fight my battles an maybe just maybe justice will be served
12:20 AM me: I deleted several posts today because it doesn't go with the story, and I'm not interested in personal fights, or **'s trying to promote his site.
12:21 AM eloise: If you are reffereing to ***** and bb they came after me. I want do do allot more but everytime I make apost the lying leeches attack.
12:22 AM me: I hate to say it, but BB is a lot more civil than **.
eloise: Look I have to go and slay some liars.
12:23 AM me: I don't know either... but I'll allow a post from BB ( assuming it's topic worthy )... I won't allow any post from **, and his many aliases.
12:24 AM eloise: no he is not he just starts shit and sits back and enjoys the fall out. he is really no better than Bryan. he just want to destroy Sean and Grant.
12:25 AM me: Well you don't see any battles on my site... and you won't ;
eloise: ****** just posts flat out lies
me: Elm, as always it's a pleasure talking/chatting with you.
12:26 AM eloise: ame here good night
me: 'til the next time ;)
Good night

Shall I continue Elm?

Can It Get Any More Delusional?

This was posted on Elm's blog earlier today... and while I appreciate the fact that there are people out there supporting all sides of this trial... this post just takes the cake for being a bit absurd (my comments injected in bold):

"Ladies and Gentleman it appears that Brent Corrigan has left the building. Is this in fact true or is it a joke?"

Personally... who cares?

"Harlow confirms something that was first reported on Jakesters blog.

The beach tapes are not the end all be all of this case."

It's good to see that Harlow's going to be on the jury too.

"It appears that there were no finger prints found at the crime scene and the DNA evidence is inconclusive. This is from a report in the courts discovery."

Discovery is not publicly released. It's only exchanged between prosecution, defense, and some experts. Not very many people at all get to see it. I don't think the judge even gets to see it. I'd like to see copies before I believe it.

"The beach tapes were necessary to pin this crime on Joe and Harlow. The sad thing is that they will not hold up in court because Joe and Harlow were aware of the fact that they were being recorded."

I will agree that the tapes were necessary... days 1 and 2... as to Joseph Kerekes and Harlow Cuadra being aware that they were being recorded... well okay... whatever. Joe made the mention during his jailhouse interview that it was Sean's sunglasses that were bugged - which was wrong ( a statement that DeWayne made originally in jest )... and had Harlow and Joe known, why not simply say: Nope, never met the man?

"Most of the information that they are said to have been the only ones to have is in fact not true. Several others were aware of this information before the beach tapes were recorded and the information was being shared behind the scenes."

... Again... proof please.

"Just like the police used the name Drake as a ploy to confuse and misdirect so were those behind the scenes who had the information that was presented on the beach tapes."

I think it was used to keep Harlow and Joe talking... which they clearly continued to do. The police simply didn't want them to think that they were known suspects, when in fact they were. It would appear that H & J fell for the bait.

"There are several people who had information about this case who in fact did not share it in the public forums or the blogs."

But I assume it was okay to share it with two people accused of murder? Once again... proof please.

"I for one have been called a liar on several occasions with regards to this case. Those who have an agenda have claimed that Bryan was not being investigated by the FBI. That is in fact false he was."

I hate to sound like a broken record... but proof please?

"Robert Wagner was in fact highly involved in Bryan's business affairs and will most likely be charged with conspiracy after the trial of Joe and Harlow concludes."

If Robert Wagner were so involved, why wouldn't the charges be filed now... why wait?

"The civil suit filled by the Kocis estate will be thrown out of court because it was improperly filed and the litigants were wrongly served."

This suit was filed on 01/08/08, and hasn't been thrown out yet... other than reading from the Clueless Blog, what legal basis do you have?

"Lee Bergeron will get his due in court as he will be sued and he will loose everything he has stolen from his business partners in the past. Can we say class action suit."

While I do hope Bergeron get's his day in court... class action status? I don't think so.

"Cobra Video and the Kocis estate will be facing Rico charges and Bryan's family will file bankruptcy to avoid losing all of their ill gotten gains."

Other than wishful thinking, it sure doesn't appear that the DA is in any hurry. This rumor's been circulating for more than a year, and to date nothing's happened, nor do I think anything will.

"There are documents to support all of this and just like some other bloggers who get information and report it I too get information. I just don't always report what I have. Somethings are better kept to yourself."

Ahh... the infamous 'I have proof, but I can't show you'.

"The Out magazine article came up very short with regards to what was shared with Michael Gross. It really is too bad he did not do a followup piece because he could shed some serious light on this whole case."

The one thing I can remember when speaking to Michael in regards to the story he did, was that he was very careful to verify things as fact. Perhaps the reason he didn't include some things that were shared with him was because there was no way to verify the claims. Gee... that sounds familiar.

"It looks like it was a slow news day on PC's blog because he had to come over here for a news story. I guess his imbedded spy in the Luzerne County court house took the day off or he was finally found out and fired. Pity that I wonder if Mr Melnick found out who was leaking info."

Elm, once again you come across as clueless and without proof as usual... hmm... I think I see a pattern. Guess it shouldn't be any more different than when you accused me of working for the Virginia Beach DA's office, or when you threatened to have the police show up at my door for posting Harlow Cuadra's debts. Ironically, I still have copies of all of your comments (eloise marcel). :)

Will a New Trial Date be Set During this Next Hearing?

With Judge Olszewski approving Joseph Kerekes' attorneys request for "Motion for Enlargement of Time", then Harlow Cuadra's attorneys filing a motion of request to have more time to file pre-trial motions and to postpone the March trial date, and then the judge ordering that "trial in the within matter is hereby continued until further order of this court", and finally... we have the entire Harlow Cuadra/Demetrius Fannick mess... one surely has to wonder... when will the next trial date be announced?

Sadly to say... it probably won't be announced during the upcoming April 15th hearing.

Harlow Cuadra has 30 days to file for an appeal (assuming one can be done before the trial, and the jury's still out on that one) after the judge made his ruling... this still gives him several more days after the next hearing, and it's unlikely Olszewski will choose a date until after this time.

My best educated guess for a trial date... we're looking at sometime in June or July... and to think this was supposed to have started this month (March).

On a separate note... after reading the motions again, and carefully looking at the dates... it appears that I might have another post coming... "Those things that make you go hmm... (part duex)".

The Big 'O'

With Judge Peter Paul Olszewski, Jr. residing over the Bryan Kocis homicide trial, to which Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes both stand accused. I thought it would be interesting to provide a bit of a background bio as to who Olszewski is:

• Born in 1959, in Wilkes-Barre, son of Hon. Peter Paul Sr. and June Olszewski.
• Graduted from Meyers H.S. in 1977.
• Graduted from Penn State University (B.A.), prelaw with distinction in 1981.
• Graduted from Dickinson School of Law (J.D.) in 1984.
• Elected District Attorney, Luzerne County, 1992-2000.
• Elected Judge, Court of Common Pleas in 1999.

Since taking the bench in 2000, he has presided over five homicide trials, four of them being death-penalty cases:

• Robert Protsman, First Degree Murder - sentenced to life in prison with no parole.
• Henry Stubbs III, Death-penalty case - sentenced to 2 consecutive life terms with no parole.
• Larry Tooley, Death-penalty case - sentenced to life in prison with no parole.
• Hugo Selenski, Death-penalty case - found not guilty by a jury ( during the second trial, Olszewski was removed as presiding judge).
• William Rohland, Death-penalty case - sentenced to life in prison with no parole.

Please note that this is just the listing of homicide cases that actually went to trial, and does not include pleas/dismissals.

On a side note... one of Olszewski's latest rulings (non-homicide) certainly opened some eyes.

A special thanks goes out to jp83 for originally asking, and then providing me with some of this information.