Showing posts with label Preliminary Hearing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Preliminary Hearing. Show all posts

Sunday, April 6, 2008

Comments...

After some careful consideration... I've decided that "comments" should still be permitted on posts labled "useful trial resources", regarding the Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes trial... as such, comments are once again open for these previous posts/discussions:

Harlow & Joe's Debt
Black's Beach Transcripts
Affidavit of Probable Cause
Criminal Charges Filed
Preliminary Hearing (Day 1)
Preliminary Hearing (Day 2)
2007 Timeline of Events
Evidence Presented Thus Far
Prosecution's Witness List

Comments will likely remain open until the trial of Harlow and Joe is over... if this would make things confusing, or you have a better idea... please let me know.

Monday, February 25, 2008

Witness Testimony At The Preliminary Hearing (Day 2)

On day two of the preliminary hearing for the Defendants, August 27, 2007, the first witness to testify on behalf of the Commonwealth, Grant Roy, positively identified both Defendants. Grant Roy testified in depth about his interaction with the Defendants on Saturday April 28, 2007 at Black's Beach, San Diego, California. This conversation involving Grant Roy, Sean Lockhart, Harlow Cuadra, and Joseph Kerekes was intercepted by a wire.

At the preliminary hearing, Grant Roy testified that Harlow Cuadra described that he was inside Kocis' home on the night of the murder. Cuadra had admitted that he was at the victim's home on the night of the murder "under the guidance or posed to be a model for Bryan Kocis" and prior to Cuadra's arrival at the home, "he and Kerekes had done recon on the house." Cuadra described that Kocis' "front door had two panes of glass that were in the upper portion of the front door, the very upper portion of the front door. And they also made the observation [that] there was no peephole in the front door so the only way Bryan could see who was at the front door was to actually open the front door." Cuadra also described the victim's 65-inch plasma Sony TV and twenty thousand dollar sound system, as well as, "an upstairs bedroom... I think it was a refinished or finished attic with a concave ceiling, and a twin or a small full-size bed".

Cuadra described how the homicide occurred. He stated that he controlled the pouring of alcohol on the bottle of wine that he and the victim were sharing so that the victim drank a majority of the bottle. "He said the doorbell had rang, and at the time Bryan got up, stumbled to the door, and that was it. He said it went quick and [the victim] never saw it coming." Roy futher testified that the motive behind the homicide was money. "It's all about making a buck."

Grant Roy also testified that Cuadra and Kerekes admitted that after the murder, they took three computer towers, two laptops, 2257 business forms, other Cobra Video business records, master tapes and DVD's, business equipment and a Rolex watch with the initial BCK on the back of it from the Kocis residence. Cuadra said there came a time when he and Kerekes incinerated the stolen property because "it was too hot". Cuadra admitted that he and Kerekes viewed the master tapes they had taken from Kocis at their Virginia Beach home. Cuadra was going to give a tape to Sean Lockhart as a gift but did not want to connect himself to the murder, so they incinerated the tapes, as well as, the 2257's and the Rolex watch.

Grant Roy also testified to statements that the Defendant Joseph Kerekes made on April 28, 2007. Kerekes admitted seeing the victim's 65-inch TV and his Maserati in the garage. Roy testified that the Defendant Kerekes indicated that he was in the Kocis home on Wednesday January 24, 2007 and that Kerekes described both the first and second floor of the house. Kerekes also made mention of the stolen property and the destruction of it. Finally, there came a time when the Defendants became more at ease. "They felt that because of the nature of the individual, Mr. Kocis, that he was gay, that the Dallas Police Department and the State of Pennsylvania had put it on the back burner, they weren't really concerned, the went on vacation."

Trooper Brian Murphy from the Pennsylvania State Police Computer Crimes Unit testified at length to his part in the investigation. He obtained computer information about the victim using his website and email addresses, as well as, the webmaster for the victim's website to trace emails sent to the victim. This was due in large part to the information received that a prospective model scheduled to meet the victim on the night of the murder had emailed photos of himself to the victim. There were also "two model applications sent in by an individual indentifying himself as Danny Moilin with an associated email address of dmbottompa@yahoo.com."

Trooper Murphy described that an IP address gives us a specific geographical site. "It gives us a specific Internet connection location. There's over four billion possible IP addresses, and no two IP addresses can be connected to the Internet at the same time." He was also able to determine that the model application that was completed and submitted on the victim's website came from an IP address registered to Harlow Cuadra at 1028 Stratem Court, Virginia Beach Virginia. Trooper Murphy also testified to a chain of email correspondences between the victim and the dmbottompa@yahoo.com email account. Each of the emails originating from the dmbottompa email account were associated with IP addresses registered to Harlow Cuadra at the 1028 Stratem Court, Virginia Beach, VA address and/or Sprint Nextel Wireless air card registered to Cuadra. Attached to several of the emails were pictures of Harlow Cuadra, who was operating under the ruse that he was "Danny Moilin" who was interested in becoming a model for the victim. The last email confirmed a meeting time between the victim and Cuadra aka Danny Moilin of between 7-8 p.m. on January 24, 2007.

Also, Trooper Murphy testified that he determined that on January 20, 2007, that USA People Search was contacted and a background investigation on the victim, Bryan Kocis was ordered from an IP address associated with Harlow Cuadra at 1028 Stratem Court. The purchase was made on a credit card registered to Harlow Cuadra. This was four days prior to the homicide.

Corporal Leo Hannon of the Pennsylvania State Police was the last witness to testify during the two day preliminary hearing of the Defendants. Cpl. Hannon first testified that he obtained the cell phone records of the Defendant Joseph Kerekes. In reviewing the records of Kerekes' multiple cell phones, it was determined that one cell phone registered to Kerekes placed a call to another cell phone registered to Kerekes at 8:34 p.m. January 24, 2007. The signal from this call bounced off a cell tower located at Country Club Road, Dallas, Pennsylvania which can be seen from the Kocis residence. The fire at the Kocis residence was called in at approximately the same time as Kerekes' cell phone signal bounced off the aforementioned tower.

Next, Cpl. Hannon testified that he contacted the Enterprise Rental Agency on Virginia Beach Boulevard, Virginia Beach. He was able to obtain a rental agreement showing that Harlow Cuadra rented a silver Nissan XTerra on January 23, 2007 and returned the vehicle on January 25, 2007. Cpl. Hannon also analyzed the mileage parameters. It was determined that the roundtrip from Virginia Beach, VA to Dallas, Pennsylvania and back was approximately 770-900 miles depending upon which route was taken. The vehicle could clearly have made the roundtrip.

Next, Cpl. Hannon testified that he had obtained information from Superior Pawn Shop in Virginia Beach, Virginia related to the Defendants. It was determined that the Defendants had purchased weapons with which the Kocis homicide could have been carried out on January 23, 2007. During Cpl. Hannon's testimony a surveillance video from the Superior Pawn Shop from the morning of January 23, 2007 was shown. The video showed, and Cpl. Hannon identified, the Defendants making purchases. Cpl. Hannon then testified to a receipt that he obtained from Superior Pawn Shop for the purchases made by the Defendants. They purchased a Smith & Wesson revolver, ammunition for that firearm and a Sig Arms Model No. FX18G folding knife which had approximately a 5" blade.

Cpl. Hannon also testified to obtaining information on a Trac Phone which was purchased, activated and only utilized to contact the victim. The only calls took place from January 22, 2007 up and until the victim's death. Also, particular phone calls placed from the Trac Phone occured in conjunction with emails between dmbottompa or Danny Moilin email account and the victim's email account. For example, through email correspondence a time was scheduled for "Danny Moilin" to contact the victim. The victim's phone records show that the scheduled phone call came in from the Trac Phone.

Next, Cpl. Hannon was responsible for transporting the Defendant Kerekes back to Pennsylvania after he waived extradition. During that trip, they took the Chesapeake Bay route; route 13 through Delaware, Maryland and subsequently through routes 95 and 476. While they were commencing this trip, Kerekes asked Cpl. Hannon why they "weren't taking the Route 264 West route, as he had taken that route prior to when he had made trips to Pennsylvania."

Cpl. Hannon also testified to his interview with Grant Roy following the encounter on Black's Beach between Roy, Lockhart, Cuadra and Kerekes on April 28, 2007. The Defendants made admissions to Grant Roy about several things, but in particular, they had information "regarding the architecture and contents of the victim's residence, as it related to an entertainment system, plasma TV... that were found in the residence." Also, Cpl. Hannon was able to confirm that "information regarding the victim's watch having been stolen" or information regarding the ingestion of alcohol had not been reported to the public, yet the Defendants were aware of those pieces of evidence.

Finally, Cpl. Hannon testified about the execution of a search warrant upon the Defendants' Virginia Beach residence which was conducted by the Virginia Beach Police Department in conjunction with the PA State Police Investigative Task Force. At that time, the police seized two video recorders which had matched the description previously given by witnesses Michael Kocis and Robert Wagner identified as being missing from Bryan Kocis' residence after his death. The serial numbers on the cameras had been obliterated. The F.B.I. Analyst George Skaluga who will testify at trial and whose anticipated testimony was summerized by Cpl. Hannon, opined that sample film taken through the seized camera is consistent with known video films taken by the victim Kocis.

Sunday, February 24, 2008

Witness Testimony At The Preliminary Hearing (Day 1)

Though the Preliminary Hearing happened several months ago, we never really got a good look as to what was said during testimony. The newspapers only offered snippets, and Harlow's blog obmitted some information.

Since these same witnesses will be testifying at the trial(s) (when ever that happens), I thought it would be good to post a summary of what was said and add a permalink to it on the right-hand side under "Useful Trial Resources". You'll certainly notice lots of previously known information, but I think you'll easily find some 'new' stuff too.

The following witnesses testified as to the aforementioned offense at the preliminary hearing against Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes: Luzerne County Deputy Coroner William Lisman, Luzerne County Coroner Dr. John Consalvo, Justin Hensley, Thakor Patel, James Gilbert, Amy Zamerowski, Dallas Township Fire Department Chief Harry Vivian, Pennsylvania State Police Fire Marshall Ronald Jarocha, Thomas Baker, Michael Kocis, Robert Wagner, Grant Roy, Pennsylvania State Trooper Brian Murphy, and Cpl. Leo Hannon. A summary of the witness' testimony taken from the transcripts follows:

Deputy Coroner William Lisman testified that he recieved a telephone call from the 911 Communication Center on the evening in question to respond to Midland Drive in Dallas, PA. He further testified that he was asked to examine a body that was badly burned and which was later identified as the deceased Bryan Kocis. Mr. Lisman further described a frothy, bubbly are of fluid common to fire victims due to super heating of the fluid in the body, however, in Mr. Kocis' case, the frothy, bubbly fluid was occuring around his neck. Mr. Lisman also testified that upon a closer view of the deceased, he viewed what he believed to be stab wounds on the victim's chest and a laceration to the victim's neck.

Mr. Lisman further testified that the body was badly burned and it was not readily identifiable. He stated that at the autopsy on January 25, 2007, the body was identified through the use of dental records obtained by Kocis' family members.

Dr. John Consalvo testified that he attended the autopsy of the victim which was performed by Dr. Mary Pascucci. He stated that "the cause of death was a new decapitating wound to the neck. And the manner of death was homicide." Dr. Cansalvo also described the condition of the victim's body. He described second degree burns on the victim's back, as well as, third degree burning on his legs; his hands and arm were burned and his fingertips were completely burned. Fragments of cloth were burned to his skin. He further indicated that the victim's genitals were charred and there was a stab wound to the left side of the groin area.

Dr. Consalvo also testified that the victim's windpipe was completely severed as was his esophagus. Furthermore, the victim's carotid artery, one of the main arteries from the heart to the brain, was severed. This was determined to be the probably cause of death. There was also testimony as to 28-29 postmortem stab wounds to the victim. It was also determined that at the time the fire started the victim was not alive. Eighty percent of the body had third degree burns rendering the autopsy more difficult to complete.

At the preliminary hearing, Justin Hensley testified to his personal knowledge of the Defendent's business endeavors, namely their escort service and pornographic video production and website. Hensley also testified that both Defendents made statements in his presence that Cobra Video, which was owned and operated by the victim Bryan Kocis, "was one of the big competitions because of its success through the Internet, especially for the gay pornographic world... yes, it was a big rival, you know. It was, in their way, of becoming bigger." Furthermore, Hensley testified that he had heard about Sean Lockhart a.k.a. Brent Corrigan, from the Defendents in January of 2007. He stated that "[the Defendents] wanted [Sean Lockhart] to work for them because that would definitely help boost profit for the company if they had a star like that working for them." "They wanted to try and recruit him to their side, to the Boybatter name so it could help, you know, with the business", and in terms of money, they were looking to make "as much as possible". However, "Mr. Lockhart... had a contract through Cobra, so the only thing standing in their way was Mr. Kocis", because "nobody would, in that kind of industry with that money and everything, especially if he was under contract. They just wouldn't let him go like that to work with somebody else."

Justin Hensley also testified to the Defendants' extravagant tastes in, among other things, watches. More specifically, Hensley stated that "they had a nice collection of really high end watches as in Rolex, Omega." The relavance of this is that Bryan Kocis' Rolex watch, which further testimony will show he rarely took off his wrist, was reportedly missing after the murder. Finally, Hensley testified that the Defendants were acting differently after the death of Kocis and it seemed like Harlow Cuadra was acting "kind of like sketchy, like he was trying to push away from answering questions" regarding the Defendants' involvement in the homicide.

Thakor Patel testified that he is the owner/manager of the Fox Ridge Inn in Plains Township. He stated that on January 23, 2007, Joe Kerekes checked-in for two nights and the room was registered for two people. Kerekes was required to show photo identification at the time of check-in and registered that the vehicle he arrived in was gray in color. Kerekes, on the check-in slip, noted that he was from Virginia and originally started to provide an address of "1028 Str" before crossing it out and giving a different address. Finally, Mr. Patel noted that the hotel does not have Internet access and that if someone wanted to access the Internet, they would have to use their own wireless Internet. Mr. Patel documented Mr. Kerekes' VA Drivers License NO. XXXXXXXXX. Later, Cpl. Hannon noted this was in fact Kerekes' Virginia Drivers License.

Next, James Gilbert testified that he resides on Midland Drive in Dallas and was a neighbor of Bryan Kocis. He stated that he walked his dog on Midland Drive, including past the Kocis home, between approximately 7:35 to 7:50 p.m. on January 24, 2007. He further stated that at the time, he noticed a silver SUV in Kocis' driveway up towards the garage. He found this somewhat peculiar because vehicles didn't usually park in the driveway of the Kocis home; they typically parked in a spot in front of the home. Gilbert was shown Exhibit No. 12, which was a photo of a silver Nissan XTerra that Defendant Harlow Cuadra rented. The witness positively identified Exhibit No. 12 as the make and type of vehicle that he had seen on the evening of Wednesday, January 24, 2007 in the Kocis driveway. Gilbert recalled seeing flames coming from the Kocis residence at approximately 8:15-8:30 p.m. that evening.

Next, Amy Zamerowski testified that on the evening of January 24, 2007, she was going to pick up her friend Amy Withers at 64 Midland Drive, Dallas, right next door to the Kocis residence. She recalls that she turned onto Midland Drive at precisely 8:26 p.m. When she pulled into the Withers' driveway, there was a light colored SUV backing out of the Kocis driveway. Ms. Zamerowski was shown exhibits 13 through 25 which were photos taken by the Pennsylvania State Police of a silver Nissan XTerra. She testified that she was previously shown these photos and informed the State Police that the Nissan XTerra could have been the vehicle she had seen backing out of the Kocis driveway on the evening in question. Finally, Ms. Zamerowski testified that after seeing the vehicle leaving the Kocis driveway, she entered the Withers residence. A few moments later, someone knocked on the door warning them to get out of the house because there was a fire next door at the Kocis residence.

Next, Dallas Twp. Fire Chief Harry Vivian testified that a fire alarm came into the department for the Kocis home at 8:35 p.m. on January 24, 2007. It took the fire department approximately 20 minutes to one half hour to supress the fire and there was heavy fire damage to the front porch and the front of the house, namely the living room. It was the living room that the body of Bryan Kocis was found. Furthermore, Chief Vivian testified that when he went to the house with the State Police Fire Marshall, they found two smoke detectors which were removed from their mounts. The first floor smoke detector was placed on a table near the wall and the upstairs smoke detector was lying on the bathroom floor off the main hallway.

Trooper Ron Jarocha, Pennsylvania State Police Deputy Fire Marshall, then took the stand. He testified that, based on his knowledge, training and experience, it was his opinion that the fire was arson. He believed that "an open flame was used to ignite combustible materials which were placed behind the love seat." He opined that in the area of the love seat, "you could see a burn pattern on the floor, and the charring on the back of the [love seat]... If the fire started elsewhere in the room, this would be a protected area, and no reason for the fire to have burned underneath that area." He also noted that while removing items from the area of the love seat, the State Police "found remnants of cushioning... the foam which is inside the seats. [They] also found remnants of like a throw pillow. A small pillow that had like tassels on it. That was attached to the back of the house somewhere [near the love seat]. We also found signs of paper products, like cardboard paper. There were numerous, numerous combustible items being in the [love seat area]." He further testified in regards to the origin of fire that he "found no causes for this fire to occur between the coach - directly behind the love seat. There was nothing there to accidentally cause this fire." He also testified to finding the smoke detectors removed and placed in other locations.

Michael Kocis was the victim's father and the executor of the victim's estate. Prior to the start of his testimony, the defense attorneys stipulated that, with regards to the abuse of the corpse charge, "they would agree that Mr. Kocis would testify that the condition of this altered or destroyed corpse of his son would outrage the ordinary family sensibilities." They did, however, reserve their right to argue that it was not they who abused the corpse. He testified that his son was a quiet, private person who kept to himself. It was the normal practice for the family to call ahead before visiting the victim; they did not come to the victim's house unannounced. He also testified that there were several items of personal property that were missing from Bryan Kocis' home from the incident of January 24, 2007, namely two high-end expensive camcorders, computer towers, a Rolex watch which the younger Kocis never took off, as well as, business records such as 2257 forms. There items were reported missing to Thomas Baker, Nationwide Insurance Claim Representative who testified that the replacement value of the fire destroyed home was $208,254.00 and the total personal property loss due to the fire, as well as, items reported missing was $216,000.00.

The final witness to testify on day 1 of the preliminary hearing for the Defense was Robert Wagner, who was one of the victim's best friends. Robert Wagner described several of the items the victim used for his business including laptop computers, computer towers, and 2257 forms that were necessary in the pornography business and the locations where they were kept. Mr. Wagner also described two camcorders owned by the victim which he positively identified in a photo marked as exhibit 45. These are items that Michael Kocis had previously identified as being missing from his son's home after the incident and were included in the insurance claim submitted to Nationwide Insurance. Wagner also described Bryan Kocis' Rolex watch that he wore all the time, as well as, a flat sceen TV that the victim had just purchased at Christmastime. The Rolex watch was missing after January 24, 2007 and the TV was destroyed in the fire. Robert Wagner testified that he had seen all of these items in the victim's residence as recently as Sunday January 21, 2007.

Robert Wagner also testified that Bryan Kocis was "an intensively private person" and he did not have an open-door policy to visitors; advanced notice was required.

Finally, Robert Wagner testified that Bryan Kocis planned on meeting a new model on Wednesday January 24, 2007 between 7 and 8 p.m. Kocis informed Wagner of this via email and attached photos of the new model. The photos were attached to a file named "Danny" and Wagner testified that he recognized the photos when shown to him again. He recognized the person in the photos emailed to him by the victim as Harlow Cuadra and made an in-court identification of the Defendant. The victim was planning to meet Cuadra on the evening of his death under the aggregious assumption that was "Danny" a prospective new model.

Sunday, August 26, 2007

Kerekes, Cuadra Upbeat Despite Murder Charges

Joseph Kerekes

The Citizen's Voice is reporting that despite facing murder charges, Joseph Kerekes, 33, appeared upbeat while exiting the courtroom Thursday, his head held high, a pleased expression on his face.

“I just think it’s great the burglary charges were dropped. We didn’t steal anything from that poor man,” he said, commenting on a district judge’s decision to uphold all charges – including homicide, conspiracy, arson, and abuse of corpse – against him and 26-year-old Harlow Cuadra, except for burglary and conspiracy to commit burglary.

While a couple of dropped burglary counts may sound minor in comparison to the litany of other charges the two gay porn actors still face in connection with the murder of gay porn movie producer Bryan Charles Kocis, Kerekes had good reason to rejoice.

Thursday’s preliminary hearing brought the Virginia Beach men, who police say killed the 44-year-old Dallas Township man because he was their rival in the gay pornography industry, one step closer to avoiding the possibility of the death penalty.

For prosecutors to seek the death penalty, one of 18 “aggravating” circumstances must be present, according to Pennsylvania Criminal Code. Most involve more unusual circumstances like torture or the murder of a child. The circumstance most likely to affect the Kocis case is if the defendants are found to have committed the murder “while in the perpetration of felony.”

Prosecutors argue that the defendants slashed and stabbed Kocis to death with the intent to also commit felony robbery, making the death penalty applicable. Prosecutors said a Rolex watch, camera equipment and some business records were stolen.

Bill Ruzzo

"If I can get the robbery charges dropped, I think that would take death out of the case," said Bill Ruzzo [above], Cuadra's attorney."

However, the investigators cannot prove that the items stolen from Kocis’ home were part of the motive for the murder, Ruzzo and Frank Nocito, Kerekes’ attorney, argued at the preliminary hearing. The goods could have been taken as an afterthought once the murder had already occurred, they argued.

“The crime here was not a robbery. It was a theft. The thought of the stealing of the goods was done after the murder,” Ruzzo said. “The motive of the murder was the murder. It wasn’t to take a Rolex watch and computer tower.”

And since medical experts testified Kocis was already dead when the killer or killers set his home on fire, the defense attorney will argue the arson charges cannot be used to justify the death penalty either, Ruzzo said.

But the arson could open the door to another aggravating circumstance, Melnick said, which states the death penalty can be sought if the offense “created a grave risk of death to another person.”

In his closing statement at the preliminary hearing Thursday, Melnick referenced the quick response of volunteer firefighters who were put in danger while extinguishing the blaze and, incidentally, preserving the crime scene.

“We’re looking at that right now,” Melnick said.

----

Here again are the various aggravating and mitigating factors applied to potential death penalty cases in PA.

-PC

Friday, August 24, 2007

Prelim, Day Two: Late Updates

Harlow Cuadra

Update: Court TV (8:13 pm) - reports an interesting exchange in court yesterday. "An e-mail account registered to Kerekes was accessed shortly before the murder, but [State Trooper] Murphy said he didn't currently have records to show whether the account just remained open or if e-mails were sent.

"'So he could have logged in and walked away to do something else, like walk in a house or commit murder?" Melnick asked.

"'Or he could have been sitting there the whole time?" Kerekes' lawyer, Joe Necito, asked during cross-examination."

----

There was precious little good news for Harlow Cuadra and Joe Kerekes following a day of testimony in a Pennsylvania courtroom—a day that saw a flood of evidence wash over the pair accused of Bryan Kocis’ murder.

“It sucks. I did not kill that man,” Cuadra said, as he headed back to his cell in the Lackawanna county jail.

Kerekes, who had told reporters he’d have a statement after the hearing, could only mutter, “I was never in that house and we will hire an expert to prove that I was nowhere near that house."

Joe Kerekes

Kerekes has maintained that he was back at the Fox Ridge Inn when the murder was committed, working online. Testimony from a State Police investigator indicates that someone was online using Kerekes’ email account immediately after the murder, but that cellular-tower logs show the web was accessed wirelessly just after the killing... and from very near the victim’s home.

That would place whoever accessed Kerekes' email several miles from the Fox Ridge Inn, and quite some distance from a workable alibi.

Magistrate Tupper did dismiss some charges in the case: charges of burglary and conspiracy to commit burglary will not be pursued because Tupper found that the prosecution did not meet its legal burden on those crimes.

Speaking after the hearing, Cuadra’s attorney tried to put a good face on what was a long day that turned out badly, “I am glad any charge is dismissed,” he said.

Prosecutors say they still have not decided whether to seek the death penalty in the case.

According to authorities, the accused Virginia Beach couple counted on a lot of things to help them get away with their crimes. Grant Roy testified that the suspects told him that the police wouldn’t be interested in the murder of a gay man.

Apparently, they were wrong.

Likewise, they’d counted on the fire to destroy all evidence of the crime, but, as Assistant District Attorney Michael Melnick put it, “the one thing they didn’t have a plan for was the volunteer firefighters. In two minutes, firefighters were on the scene. That’s one thing they didn’t have a plan for.”

Sources: Times Leader, Citizens' Voice, WNEP TV-16

Thursday, August 23, 2007

Prelim, Day Two: Live Details

Note: The following entries were blogged live and in real time. Therefore, some links still work, and some now redirect to later updates (at the behest of the media source). We strove to quote the relevant bits in each live entry, as it was presented.

Update: Times Leader (7:27 pm) - is reporting that two Virginia Beach, Va., men will face criminal homicide and related charges in connection to the slaying of local gay porn producer Bryan Kocis in Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas.

District Judge James E. Tupper held the charges against Harlow Cuadra, 26, and Joseph Kerekes, 33, to court after a two day preliminary hearing.

Update: Citizens' Voice (6:58 pm) - reports that Testimony has concluded in the preliminary hearing to determine if Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes should stand trial for the murder of Bryan Charles Kocis.

Attorneys for both sides are preparing their closing statements.

Update: Times Leader (6:29 pm) - reports that signals from two cell phones registered to Joseph Kerekes were processed through a cellular tower on Country Club Road in Dallas Township, a short distance from the Midland Drive home of Bryan Kocis, state police Cpl. Leo Hannon Jr. said.

Hannon said the calls were made at 8:34 p.m. on Jan. 24, the exact same time firefighters were dispatched to Kocis' home for a fire.

Prosecutors are continuing to present testimony and evidence during the preliminary hearing for Kerekes, 33, and Harlow Cuadra, 26, who are accused in the killing of 44-year old Kocis.

Update: WNEP TV-16 (6:04 pm) - Live 6:00 pm news reports the preliminary hearing is still continuing.

Update: Citizens' Voice (5:47 pm) - reports that State police Cpl. Leo Hannon testified to obtaining receipts showing that Cuadra rented a gray Nissan Xterra in Virginia Beach the day before the murder.

... The vehicle was returned the day after the murder, according to the receipt.

The mileage used on the car was consistent with the distance between Virginia Beach and the Wilkes-Barre area, Hannon testified.

... Hannon [also] testified [that the knife Cuadra and Kerekes bought in Virginia Beach] ... was the type of knife that would be capable of committing Kocis' murder.

Update: Times Leader (5:27 pm) - reports Surveillance videos from a Virginia Beach, Va., pawn shop shows Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes allegedly buying weapons on Jan. 23, a day before Bryan Kocis was killed in Dallas Township.

In one of the videos, Cuadra, 26, and Kerekes, 33, are standing with their backs to the camera looking into a glass display case.

State police Cpl. Leo Hannon Jr. said a receipt - time stamped at 9:44 a.m. on Jan. 23 - was a Smith and Wesson handgun, ammunition and a folding knife with a five-inch blade.

Update: WNEP TV-16 (5:05 pm) - Live 5:00 pm news reports the preliminary hearing is still on-going. Will have a live report from the courthouse as soon as the hearing has ended.

Update: Times Leader (4:25 pm) is reporting that A state police computer forensic examiner said an e-mail registered to Joseph Kerekes was logged onto at 7:43 p.m. on Jan. 24, around the time when a witness saw a light colored sport utility vehicle in the driveway at Bryan Kocis' Dallas Township home.

Trooper Brian Murphy said the e-mail registered to Kerekes, 33, was accessed through a wireless air card registered to Harlow Cuadra.

Kerekes' co-defense lawyer, Joseph Nocito, was able to determine, upon questioning of Murphy, that Kerekes' e-mail was accessed at 7:43 p.m. on Jan. 24.

Kerekes, during a jailhouse interview in July, said he was at the Fox Ridge Inn motel in Plains Township using his e-mail account.

Update: Times Leader (3:58 pm) - reports that A Yahoo! e-mail account set up on Jan. 22 was solely used to communicate with Bryan Kocis, and was last used on Jan. 25, a day after Kocis was found dead inside his Dallas Township home, a state police computer forensic examiner testified.

Trooper Brian Murphy said the dmbottom.com e-mail was used up to three dozen times to communicate with Kocis between Jan. 22 and Jan. 24.

Murphy said he was also able to trace e-mail communications from dmbottom.com through an IP address using a wireless air card beginning on Jan. 23, a day before Kocis was killed.

Update: Citizens' Voice (3:40 pm) - adds that a state police investigator testified Kocis exchanged about three dozen emails from an account with an IP address registered to Cuadra.

Some of the emails included what appeared to be pictures of Cuadra, although the author of the emails identified himself as Danny Moilin.

Through the emails, Kocis and Danny made arrangements to meet the night of the murder, the investigator said. The last communication occurred around 7:15 p.m., about an hour before firefighters responded to a structure fire at Kocis' home and found him inside slashed and stabbed to death.

Police contend Cuadra and Kerekes wanted Kocis killed because he was a rival adult gay film producer and they wished to lure his most popular performer, Sean Lockhart, to their company.

Update: Citizens' Voice (3:15 pm) - reports Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes were in the home of Brian Charles Kocis the night the adult film producer was murdered, a prosecution witness testified during a preliminary hearing today.

Grant Roy, a fellow pornography producer, testified the two Virginia Beach men accused of killing the 44-year-old in January described the inside of Kocis' home and recounted details of hoon the testimony given by Grant Roy.


Update: Times Leader (2:31 pm) - reports that For 1 hour and 16 minutes, Grant Roy testified as a prosecution witness during the preliminary hearing for Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes.

Roy, the first witness to testify on the second day of the hearing, admitted that he knew a conversation he had with Cuadra and Kerekes was being electronically recorded by investigators.

Roy said Cuadra and Kerekes had indicated that authorities wouldn't take the investigation seriously because Kocis was gay.

"They felt...because he (Kocis) was gay, the Dallas Township Police Department would put it on the back burner," Roy testified.

Roy remained composed during his testimony, carefully answering questions from Luzerne County Assistant District Attorney Michael Melnick, and defense lawyers Frank Nocito and William Ruzzo.

State police Trooper Brian Murphy, a computer forensic examiner, is currently testifying.

Update: From a court-watcher (2:01 pm) - "Defense lawyers are challenging prosecution's refusal to turn over the transcript from the beach conversation. Roy testified on cross-ex that he reviewed the transcript prior to taking the witness stand. Judge is taking a short break to review caselaw on the issue."

Times Leader (1:49 pm) - reports that Roy said Harlow Cuadra, 26, and Joseph Kerekes, 33, inspected Kocis' Midland Drive home before Cuadra arrived for a scheduled meeting with the 44-year old Kocis on Jan. 24.

"...they also made an observation that there was no peep hole in the door so the only way Bryan Kocis could see who was at the front door was to open the front door," Roy testified upon questions by Luzerne County Assistant District Attorney Michael Melnick.

Roy said Cuadra claimed he shared a bottle of wine with Kocis. The doorbell rang and Kocis stumbled, Roy said.

"(Cuadra) said he (Kocis) never saw it coming," Roy said.

Roy remains on the witness stand currently being questioned by Kerekes' lawyers, Frank Nocito and Joseph Nocito.

- Both PC and KM contributed to this report.

Prelim, Day Two

Grant Roy


Update: Times Leader (1:10 pm) - reports "Grant Roy first witness in Cuadra, Kerekes hearing."

Update: Citizens' Voice (12:39 pm) - is reporting "As Kerekes was led into the courtroom today, he told the media he would speak after the hearing. "I have something prepared to say on the way out," he said. Cuadra has yet to arrive in the courtroom.

"Prosecutors are expected to start today by presenting evidence of e-mail communication Cuadra allegedly had with Kocis leading up to his murder"

Update: Times Leader (12:39 pm) - reports "Security is heightened again for the hearing. Luzerne County sheriff deputies are using a hand-held metal detector searching people before they enter the courtroom, and Dallas and Kingston township police departments with a canine unit are monitoring the parking lot.

"A key witness from out-of-the area was observed walking into the building earlier.

"It remains unknown if assistant district attorneys Michael Melnick and Tim Doherty will play a recording of a conversation Cuadra and Kerekes allegedly had with Grant Roy and Sean Lockhart on a nude beach near San Diego, Ca., in late April."

WNEP TV-16 (12:02 pm) - Live Noon news reports the preliminary hearing began a few minutes ago. No new video as of yet, though.

Times Leader (8:21 am) - reports that "Luzerne County prosecutors will continue today to try to persuade a magisterial district judge that they have a strong case against two men charged in connection with the slaying of local gay film producer Bryan Kocis.

"A state police computer forensic investigator is one of several witnesses that prosecutors expect to call to the stand when the preliminary hearing for Harlow Cuadra, 26, and Joseph Kerekes, 33, resumes before District Judge James E. Tupper in Kingston Township.

"Cuadra’s co-defense lawyer, Thomas S. Cometa, aggressively questioned Jarocha for nearly an hour on Monday, getting Jarocha to admit that he didn’t take any samples from the hardwood floor in the living room.

"Cometa, in an unrelated case, was successful in defending a man who was accused of setting a fire that killed his parents in Berks County. Cometa used samples of hardwood flooring from the Berks County home that had traces of leaded gasoline, which was used at that time to clean hardwood floors after construction. A dropped cigarette caused the Berks County fatal fire, according to published reports.

"Kocis’ home was demolished last week. Cometa couldn’t be reached for comment to determine if any hardwood flooring from Kocis’ living room has been preserved.

"Jarocha said he found no evidence that Kocis was a smoker."

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

That Which Is Left Unsaid

Michael Melnick
Assistant District Attorney Michael Melnick said it after Monday’s first go-round: “We have a lot more interesting things to come.”

By all accounts, the Commonwealth intends to present some of the more tech-heavy, Internet evidence in tomorrow’s extended preliminary hearing of accused killers Harlow Cuadra and Joe Kerekes. And, no doubt, there will be other sorts of evidence exhibited, too.

But what’s been most interesting so far is-- while the DA’s office appears to be putting on quite a show for Magistrate Tupper-- the case as presented has been remarkably short on specifics.

For example, according to published reports and those of court-watchers:

-Of the nearly dozen witnesses, there hasn’t been a single cop on the stand. Among other things, that means no evidence presented of anything found pursuant to search warrants for Harlow’s and Joe’s house.

-There was no testimony about the purchase of the knife in Virginia Beach.



-Three witnesses spoke about the SUV in Dallas, but no one was there to link Harlow and Joe to its rental in Virginia Beach—or to testify to the mileage that indicates they drove it far enough to reach the Wyoming Valley.

-The SUV was alleged to have left the scene just a few minutes before the fire department arrived at the house. And when the firefighters did show up, flames were actually shooting out the front door. No word, however, on who called 911, and more to the point: when, and/or why? Because a neighbor saw smoke sometime around 8:15? We don’t know, because the State hasn’t told us.

-We still don’t know the name of “Confidential Informant #1” (re: p. 16, Affidavit of Probable Cause), the one who told police Cuadra and Kerekes were “planning something big,” and were taking a trip to Pennsylvania. (By his testimony, it appears that Justin Hainesly is known as CI #2 in that document. See P. 19.)

In all, the ADAs still have a-ways to go. We'll be watching, of course.

-Both PC and KM contributed to this story.

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Late Updates


From the Citizens' Voice: "The commonwealth called 11 people to the stand Monday, some of them testifying to circumstantial evidence linking the accused men to the crime.

"Kocis’ father, Michael, testified Kocis was an intensely private person who would not have let anyone come to his home unexpectedly. Even he and his wife had to call ahead before visiting, Michael Kocis said.


"Flanked by state troopers and dressed in the green jumpsuit of the Luzerne County Correctional Facility, Kerekes smiled as he left court, sounding unconcerned.

"'I’m confident my lawyer and the evidence will vindicate us,' he said.

"Cuadra emerged minutes later wearing tan prison garbs because he is being housed apart from his alleged accomplice in Lackawanna County prison.

"He made no comment before disappearing into a police car.


"On Thursday, prosecutors will start by presenting evidence of e-mail communication Cuadra allegedly had with Kocis leading up to his murder.'We have a lot more interesting things to come,' lead prosecutor Michael Melnick said.


The latest Times Leader article on the hearing includes:

“Robert Wagner, who identified himself as Kocis’ best friend, testified that Kocis had e-mailed him pictures of a prospective new model for Cobra Video on Jan. 22. The picture was of Cuadra. Investigators suspect the photo was sent to Kocis under a fake name.

“’He told me he was meeting a new model at 7 p.m. on (Jan. 24),’ Wagner testified.

“Wagner described Kocis as a private person who wouldn’t answer his front door if someone unexpectedly stopped by. Wagner also testified that after Kocis died, he discovered two laptop computers, two computer towers, two camcorders and a Rolex watch were missing from the home.

“Investigators wouldn’t say if the missing computers or the watch were found during two searches at Cuadra’s and Kerekes’ Virginia Beach home.”


Also: “State police Deputy Fire Marshal Ron Jarocha said the fire began behind a leather loveseat in the living room. Jarocha also said two smoke alarms were detached from the ceilings inside the home.

“‘An open flame was used to ignite combustible material behind the couch,’ Jarocha said.

Apparently there was no talk of use of any accelerant in starting of the fire.


Update: A spectator at yesterday's hearing confirms that Jarocha testified that a knife was found on the floor next to Kocis' burnt body, but no evidence was introduced to identify whether or not that knife was the murder weapon.


Update II: One unidentified witness went to great lengths to remain anonymous to onlookers, entering the Magistrate's office through a side door with a plastic bag over his head.

-KM

Answers To Some Questions

In yesterday's comments, there were alot of questions. Here's an omnibus response:

Q: At what point does the DA usually announce whether he'll seek the death penalty?

A: Out of this hearing, the Magistrate will decide what charges have been supported by prima facie. If Premeditated Murder is one of those supported charges, then the DA can announce his plans vis a vis the Death Penalty at anytime after that-- it's a strategic thing.



Q: ...is the kingston township court the same as luzerne county court?

A: Not exactly. The Magistrate in Kingston will decide at the end of the prelim whether or not the case shall proceed to the PA Court of Common Pleas (where the trial would take place). A trial judge would then be assigned.

Q: I'm sure the defense would have liked to object [to Hainsely's testimony] (and probably did), but the fact it got in during this prelim tells me it was and will be admissible. [Right?]

A: Different judges may decide differently; the trial judge could easily toss out Hainsley's testimony if he thinks it's hearsay. Remember, a Magistrate in PA is terribly minor functionary. As I said once before, he literallly handles cases of spitting on the sidewalk. (I saw a friend ticketed for that once. The ticket was a Magistrate's summons. No fooling.) He generally does not put boldly put his stamp on a case. That's what Common Pleas judges are for.

Q: ...[with] no hope for acquittal. Their attorney might try to convience them [not to plead guilty. Am I correct?]

A: More often it's the other way around: counsel says plead out, but the defendant refuses.

-KM

Sunday, August 19, 2007

What To Expect


Assuming that there’s no further postponement, Monday is going to be a big day for all who follow this case: Harlow Cuadra and Joe Kerekes will have their Preliminary Hearing.

We’ve already talked about what’s likely to happen in court. Here’s what’s likely to happen here on this blog: We will do our best to present information that’s true, relevant and timely.

That word ‘true’ is first, because we’d rather post some snippet of info days after everyone else already has... if that’s how long it takes us to verify the truth of it.

Blogs are different than other media. At a newspaper, the people who put together the editorial page are set apart from the people who just gather and present facts. Here, there is no such firewall. And that means that part of what we do all day is gather facts, analyze information, form opinions, test them out, then present the results to you.

Whether you find veracity in our opinions depends on how much truth you find in our facts. If you can’t grant credibility to this blog when it reports facts, then necessarily you cannot find insight in our opinions.

We strive to perform both functions well, because opinions without truths are worthless. Likewise, truths without analysis are merely stale anecdotes.

So that’s what we seek to do here. We want to tell the truth as quickly as it can be discerned. We’re confident that that’s what our readers want. That’s what we’ve tried to do up to now. It’s what we intend to do tomorrow and all the days after that.

Our stories might not be scoops, but they will be as true as we can make them.

-Both PC and KM contributed to this story.

Saturday, August 11, 2007

Prelim 2.0

As the date for Harlow Cuadra’s and Joe Kerekes’ preliminary hearing closed in once before (then got postponed), this post was designed to explain what was going to happen in court.

But your comments have shown that there are still questions about procedure and outcomes, so... here’s more info.

What the prosecution wants: for the case to proceed. The prelim takes place in front of a magistrate. He or she is a low-level judge; the kind of judge who literally fines people for spitting on the sidewalk. Magistrates don’t try felonies. What they do is act as gatekeepers to the Court of Common Pleas (that does adjudicate serious cases). The magistrate is there to decide whether or not the State has enough evidence to take the case higher in the system.

To take the case higher, the prosecution must satisfy the magistrate (Mr. Tupper, in this instance) that they have a prima facie case against Messers. Cuadra and Kerekes.

So what’s that mean? Well...“in other words, present evidence that a crime has been committed and that the defendant is probably the perpetrator of that crime.

What actually happens in court during a prelim? Harlow and Joe will be there with their lawyers. An Assistant District Attorney (ADA) will be there. The ADA will introduce the criminal complaint, and call a short list of witnesses to support the claims in the complaint, as well as whatever other essential evidence has been uncovered since the complaint was filed.

The witnesses will mostly be state troopers, somebody from the coroner’s office and perhaps an evidence technician or two.

Very occasionally, Harlow’s and/or Joe’s lawyers will object to the form of a question that’s put to a witness. The ADA will rephrase; they will continue. In all, it’s a pretty dull date; bring kettle corn.

What the defense wants: failing dismisssal, more info on the State's case, please. That's what’s important. The prelim is the first time anybody gets to see the thrust of the prosecution’s case. Understand, the prosecution doesn’t have to unveil every last bit of evidence it has—far from it—but we will almost certainly hear evidence presented at the prelim that has not been released thus far. The defense will object to some of that evidence, but the magistrate is likely to leave any suppression issue to the trial judge's discretion.
The defense will argue that the prima facie case has not been presented.

The hearing ends when both arguments are finished and the magistrate rules: either we’re one step closer to trial (meaning the prima facie case was demonstrated) or the State sends Harlow and Joe home with the apologies of the court. From what we’ve seen of the case so far, it’s pretty clear which way this one’s going to go.

So far, the prelim is set for 20 August. We'll keep you posted.

-KM

Monday, August 6, 2007

Preliminary Hearing

The preliminary hearing for Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes is now scheduled for 8/16/2007 - according to the criminal docket:

Joe's Docket:



Harlow's Docket: