DEFENDANT CUADRA’S FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW REGARDING DEFENDANT’S’ MOTION TO SUPPRESS PHYSICAL EVIDENCE SEIZED FROM DEFENDANT’S VEHICLE FILED NUNC PRO TUNC
TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE COUNTY:
The Defendant, HARLOW RAYMOND CUADRA, by and through his appointed counsel, Stephen Menn, Esquire and Michael B. Senape, Esquire, hereby submits the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in support of Defendants’ Motions to Suppress Physical Evidence Seized From Defendant’s Vehicle Filed Nunc Pro Tunc:
I. Brief Procedural History
II. Findings of Fact
III. Conclusions of Law
IV. Conflicts of Law
The Defendant, HARLOW RAYMOND CUADRA, by and through his appointed counsel, Stephen Menn, Esquire and Michael B. Senape, Esquire, hereby submits the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in support of Defendants’ Motions to Suppress Physical Evidence Seized From Defendant’s Vehicle Filed Nunc Pro Tunc:
I. Brief Procedural History
II. Findings of Fact
III. Conclusions of Law
IV. Conflicts of Law
