Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Kerkes & Cuadra's Reply to the DA's Brief in Opposition to Suppress Search Warrant & Evidence Seized from the Residence.

DEFENDANTS KEREKES' AND CUADRA'S JOINT REPLY BRIEF TO COMMONWEALTH'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO SUPPRESS SEARCH WARRANT AND EVIDENCE SEIZED FROM 1028 STRATEM COURT, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA

I. Statement of Facts
II. Law and Argument: Virginia Search Warrant Law
III. Law and Argument: Pennsylvania Search Warrant Law
IV. Law and Argument: Pennsylvania Law Controls
V. Warrant Defects Under Pennsylvania Law
VI. Seizure Exceeded the Authorized Scope of Warrant
VII. Nighttime Execution Without Statement of Additional Reasonable Cause
VIII. Warrant Defects Under Virginia Law
IX. Siezure Exceeded the Authorized Scope of Warrant (II)
X. Conclusion
XI. Exhibits

There are more exhibits, but most of it is just copies of case law, nothing really worth posting.